2006 Ford Escape vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2006 Ford Escape is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Escape (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Escape weights approximately 205 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Escape (262 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Escape | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Escape | 220 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 262 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |