2006 Ford Escape vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Escape would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Escape (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Escape (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Escape | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Escape | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |