2006 Ford Expedition vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Expedition. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Expedition would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1320 kg more than 2006 Ford Expedition.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Expedition | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Ford | Fisker |
| Model | Expedition | Karma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 36 L |
