2006 Ford Explorer vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2006 Ford Explorer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Explorer (292 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (61 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 2006 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Seat Ronda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Explorer (407 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Explorer | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Explorer | Ronda |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |