2006 Ford Explorer vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2006 Ford Explorer is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Explorer (292 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. (131 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2006 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Explorer (407 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. (176 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Explorer | 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Explorer | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |