2006 Ford Explorer vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2006 Ford Explorer. (292 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Explorer.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Explorer. (407 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Explorer | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Explorer | GT-R |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 485 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 588 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 74 L |