2006 Ford Explorer vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Ford Explorer. (292 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Explorer.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo X670 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Explorer. (407 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo X670 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Explorer | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Explorer | X670 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |