2006 Ford F-150 vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Ford F-150 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 384 kg more than 2006 Ford F-150.
Because 2006 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-150 | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-150 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5540 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 109 L |
