2006 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-150 (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-150 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-150 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 55 L |