2006 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-150 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1405 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-150 (353 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-150 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | F-150 | C30 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |
