2006 Ford F-150 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-150 (301 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-150 (495 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-150 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-150 | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |