2006 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-150. (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-150 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-150 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-150 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | F-150 | ATS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 61 L |