2006 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-150 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-150 weights approximately 207 kg more than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Because 2006 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford F-150. (353 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-150 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | F-150 | Phantom |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 2649 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 5842 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1638 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 100 L |