2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 3200 CS.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 3200 CS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1963 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | F-250 | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 3169 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 75 L |