2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1696 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | F-250 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1481 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2660 mm |
