2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | F-250 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 4261 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2750 mm |
