2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2006 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-250 | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 6230 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 81 L |
