2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1980 Reliant Kitten
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1980 Reliant Kitten. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Reliant Kitten.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Reliant Kitten. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Reliant Kitten.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1980 Reliant Kitten | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | F-250 | Kitten |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 3330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2150 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 27 L |