2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Cressida. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Cressida.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Cressida. (132 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | F-250 | Cressida |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2187 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 132 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2650 mm |
