2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (148 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (182 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | F-250 | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1988 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2620 mm |