2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (75 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-250 | Sigma |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2520 mm |