2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2006 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1985 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F-250 | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 6749 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3030 mm |
