2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1986 Opel Omega
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1986 Opel Omega. (122 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Omega.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Omega. (175 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1986 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | F-250 | Omega |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 70 L |
