2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1988 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 929. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 929.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 929. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1988 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-250 | 929 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2720 mm |
