2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1992 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1992 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | F-250 | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2501 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2860 mm |
