2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Jaguar XJ. (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-250 | XJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 5993 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 464 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 90 L |