2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Plymouth Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | F-250 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1834 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2530 mm |
