2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2006 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-250 | FTO |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1300 mm |