2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-250 | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1400 mm |