2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi GTO would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. (426 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2006 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F-250 | GTO |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2730 mm |
