2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2000 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Kappa (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lancia Kappa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lancia Kappa. (309 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lancia Kappa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 2000 Lancia Kappa | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | F-250 | Kappa |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1929 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 309 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2710 mm |
