2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,200 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 296 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-250 | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1840 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 64 L |