2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (208 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo S60. (407 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | F-250 | S60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2299 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 70 L |
