2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Smart Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Smart Roadster would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Smart Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | F-250 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 698 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 35 L |