2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2003 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Baleno. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Baleno.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Suzuki Baleno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Baleno. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2003 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | F-250 | Baleno |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1298 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2490 mm |