2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1386 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-250 | Outlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2374 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 59 L |