2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 4,200 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 206 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-250 | Outlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4200 cc | 2376 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 59 L |