2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | F-250 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2359 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |