2006 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Land Rover LR2. 2012 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2006 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-250 | 2012 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | F-250 | LR2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 3200 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 317 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4496 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1908 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2659 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 70 L |