2006 Ford F-350 vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Ford F-350 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 157 kg more than 2006 Ford F-350.
Because 2006 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-350 (621 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 478 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (143 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-350 | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-350 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6801 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 621 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2700 mm |