2006 Ford F-350 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford F-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (362 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 512 kg more than 2006 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-350 (621 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford F-350 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | F-350 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6801 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 621 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6240 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 55 L |