2006 Ford F-350 vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2006 Ford F-350 and 2006 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-350 (362 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Because 2006 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-350 (621 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2006 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-350 | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-350 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 362 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 621 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
