2006 Ford Fiesta vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Ford Fiesta is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Fiesta (100 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fiesta should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (188 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Fiesta. (146 Nm). This means 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Fiesta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Fiesta | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fiesta | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2554 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 98 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2520 mm |
