2006 Ford Focus vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2006 Ford Focus is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Commander (140 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Ford Focus. (136 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Focus weights approximately 1436 kg more than 1954 Studebaker Commander.
Because 1954 Studebaker Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Studebaker Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Focus | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Focus | Commander |
Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 71.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3070 mm |