2006 Ford Focus vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Ford Focus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Ford Focus. (136 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Focus weights approximately 1722 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Focus | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Focus | Tiger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2190 mm |