2006 Ford Focus vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 Ford Focus is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Focus (136 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Focus weights approximately 1991 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Focus (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Focus | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Focus | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2420 mm |