2006 Ford Freestyle vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2006 Ford Freestyle is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Freestyle (203 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 280 kg more than 2006 Ford Freestyle.
Because 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Freestyle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Freestyle | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Freestyle | 6C |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1938 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 77 L |
