2006 Ford Freestyle vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2006 Ford Freestyle is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Freestyle (204 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Freestyle weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Freestyle | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Freestyle | 4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
