2006 Ford Freestyle vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Ford Freestyle is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Freestyle weights approximately 671 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 2006 Ford Freestyle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Freestyle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Freestyle | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Freestyle | 626 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2520 mm |
