2006 Ford Fusion vs. 1959 Skoda 440
To start off, 2006 Ford Fusion is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Skoda 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Skoda 440 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Fusion (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1959 Skoda 440. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1959 Skoda 440.
Because 1959 Skoda 440 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Skoda 440. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Fusion (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Skoda 440. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Skoda 440.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Fusion | 1959 Skoda 440 | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Fusion | 440 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1440 mm |
